Dubravka Šuica, the designated Commissioner, is uncertain whether her experience at the Berlaymont Palace will continue, after five years on Ursula von der Leyen’s team. As the Croatian candidate with responsibility for the Mediterranean, she also oversees relations with non-EU countries in the region. However, even before officially taking up her role, she has already made her first gaffe.
During her hearings in front of the European Parliament, Šuica was asked about her views on the case of Giulio Regeni, the Italian student who was brutally tortured and murdered while conducting research in Egypt. To the trauma of many, Šuica responded with “I am not familiar with this Italian citizen’s case.” This statement has sparked outrage and concern among both Italian and European citizens.
It is surprising that a designated Commissioner, who has been in the European Union since 2013, is not aware of such a high-profile case that has been widely covered by international media. Regeni’s tragic death has been a source of ongoing tension between Italy and Egypt, with the Italian government demanding answers and justice for his murder. Šuica’s lack of knowledge on this matter raises questions about her qualifications and understanding of EU affairs.
This gaffe has also raised concerns about Šuica’s suitability for the role of Commissioner for the Mediterranean. As the region continues to face numerous challenges, including migration, security, and economic issues, it is crucial for the Commissioner to have a strong understanding of the complexities and dynamics of the region. Šuica’s lack of knowledge on the case of Regeni, a prominent issue in the Mediterranean, is a worrying sign.
Moreover, Šuica’s response has also been seen as disrespectful and dismissive towards the Italian government and the victim’s family. The Italian Foreign Minister, Luigi Di Maio, has called for an explanation from the European Commission, stating that “the Commission must guarantee that the designated Commissioner has the necessary sensitivity and competence to deal with the issue of human rights.”
Despite this initial setback, it is important to note that Šuica’s nomination as Commissioner was met with overall positive reactions. She has a strong background in local and European politics, having served as a Member of European Parliament since 2013 and as the Mayor of Dubrovnik from 2001 to 2009. Her experience in the Mediterranean region can also bring valuable insights to the Commission.
Furthermore, Šuica’s response to the Regeni case should not overshadow her overall qualifications and capabilities as a Commissioner. It is important to give her the opportunity to prove herself and to address any concerns during her term. As the designated Commissioner for Democracy and Demography, Šuica has the potential to make a positive impact in the European Union.
In conclusion, while Šuica’s gaffe on the Regeni case is certainly concerning, it should not overshadow her overall qualifications and potential as a Commissioner. It is essential for her to address this issue and demonstrate her understanding of the complexities of the Mediterranean region. As she prepares to take on her role, Šuica must work towards gaining the trust and confidence of both the European Parliament and the citizens of the EU.